Jump to latest follow 1 9 of 9 posts.
General grabber at2 vs bfg rugged terrain.
General makes an at2 that is an all terrain.
Both the general at2 and the bfg.
Bfgoodrich all terrain t a ko2 the bf goodrich tires bite into mud confidently and offers dependable gripping force but doesn t eject the mud reliably.
What are everyone s views on the general grabber at2s and the bfg all terrains what should i get anybody know the pros and cons of each etc.
My concern on the ford 350 weight factor on the 2 ply sidewall of the general atx vs the 3 ply rating of the bfg ko2s.
Looking at general tire s off road portfolio an aggressive all terrain tire was the missing puzzle piece.
Bfg wouldn t warranty the tire not happy.
General grabber at2 or bf goodrich all terrain t a or any other suggestions.
It s common for mud to build up during use which makes these less useful for muddy conditions than the falken tires are.
Grabber at2 light truck all terrain all season tire aggressive all terrain tire designed with a rugged self cleaning tread pattern to provide off road traction durability and impressive paved road performance.
Joined jul 26 2010 77 posts.
I have run general at2 and now a set of atx.
Discussion starter 1 jul 30 2010.
And with its strong grasp in the mud terrain segment the a t x is general tire s next logical step.
I am looking for another set of at s for this rig.
Any comments would be helpful.
Their original red letter grabber first featured on the 2010 4runner in the baja 1000 has been replaced by the grabber x3.
The general grabber is a more aggressive tire and will make more noise than the an at tire.
General grabber at2 vs bfgoodrich all terrain t a ko.
I only highlight these as the search function google have pointed me that way.
We have used every tire out there an sell all the brands through our shop.